NESSAholics.com
Other Topics => Polls => Topic started by: Steveau on September 30, 2004, 01:14:28 pm
-
It would define a marriage as only between a man and a woman.
-
*huge debate flashbacks*
Hehe. I'm not going there again :?
-Kev
-
NO
And that's why, if I were eligable, I woukd vote GREEN. Kerry flip-flops the issue, and Bush is a total homophobe.
-
*huge debate flashbacks*
Hehe. I'm not going there again :?
-Kev
This is just a poll. I'm not asking people to debate the issue. In fact, I'm hoping they don't.
-
Yes
-
Yes.
-
I don't give a damn about gay marriage.
-
NO
Same. A man and a woman, a man and a man, a woman and woman, I don't fucking care, if they love each other, then why should they not be allowed to get married?
-
Yes.
-
NO
Same. A man and a woman, a man and a man, a woman and woman, I don't fucking care, if they love each other, then why should they not be allowed to get married?
werd.
-
no.
an amendment?..the constitution? China, here we come?
-
um....its against the rules for two males/two females to get maried. I don't think it's too wrong if they have a sexual relationship or whatever but the marriage..... is just absurd.
-
NO NO NO NO NOOOO!!!!!!!! :x
-
no, because love is love
-
They can do whatever they want to do - let 'em get hitched. But as soon as they "legally" call it marriage, I want out.
-
Ugh, you go on and on about rights to EVERYTHING in your country and then you deny people the right to do something based on their sexuality. Yeah, fair play there. :roll:
-
love is love
word to that....let 'em get married if they want to...it's not a big deal
-
love is love
word to that....let 'em get married if they want to...it's not a big deal
yet, you're for Bush...
-
love is love
word to that....let 'em get married if they want to...it's not a big deal
yet, you're for Bush...
Uh-oh, go Joey! :D
-
Ugh, you go on and on about rights to EVERYTHING in your country and then you deny people the right to do something based on their sexuality. Yeah, fair play there. :roll:
i'd like to argue with you but i really can't. one of the main reasons i don't want bush to get re elected is because he's for denying people their basic civil rights. Kerry isn't much better, but at least he's for giving same sex couples equal rights.....still not the same, but better than taking everything away.
-
Ugh, you go on and on about rights to EVERYTHING in your country and then you deny people the right to do something based on their sexuality. Yeah, fair play there. :roll:
i'd like to argue with you but i really can't. one of the main reasons i don't want bush to get re elected is because he's for denying people their basic civil rights. Kerry isn't much better, but at least he's for giving same sex couples equal rights.....still not the same, but better than taking everything away.
VOTE NADER OR GREEN PARTY
-
love is love
word to that....let 'em get married if they want to...it's not a big deal
yet, you're for Bush...
so what
not everyone agrees with each candidate 100%
-
As someone sayed here Love is love....
If people, who ever they are, want to get married then they sould do that IMO..........if they really love each other i dont see any probelm (except is there are these two 12 year olds or something, but for everyone over 18 i think its fine....)
-
Ugh, you go on and on about rights to EVERYTHING in your country and then you deny people the right to do something based on their sexuality. Yeah, fair play there. :roll:
i'd like to argue with you but i really can't. one of the main reasons i don't want bush to get re elected is because he's for denying people their basic civil rights. Kerry isn't much better, but at least he's for giving same sex couples equal rights.....still not the same, but better than taking everything away.
VOTE NADER OR GREEN PARTY
If it were Nader vs. Kerry then i might consider it (key word here being might). But since Nader doesn't have a prayer (don't get mad, we all know it's the truth) and i 100% refuse to vote for bush, i'm voting for Kerry.
-
love is love
word to that....let 'em get married if they want to...it's not a big deal
yet, you're for Bush...
haha jb, i thought you were talking about me... i'm like, uh, since when? hahaha
and then i was like "wait a minute, jb and i always talk about our liberal views.. uhh.." haha :-)
-
lmao kelley--it wasn't to you, silly.
-
Gay marriage should be as legal as straight marriage!
-
They can unify under the law as closely as they want to, but it can never be marriage. That is all.
-
This like everything else, has no real meaning to me.
From what I know, all the right-wine Pat Robertson whores are appaled tabout gays getting 'marriage'. Key word is the word itself. Now, of course, they'd bitch anyway, but if civil unions were given with the same rights of marriage, I think that the majority of gay-rights supporters would be happy. They'd be recognized and have the same things straight people get, only it'd be called something else.
Naturally, the extremes on both sides would still be pissed. But that's to be expected; you can't make everyone happy.
:| *sigh* :|
-
NO
Love and compassion, that's what we should all be about, not taking away the rights of others. We should leave all the judgements and conclusions about what should and shouldn't be to the higher, divine power; and not try to interpret what's in a really old book and has been revised loads of times by different people.
-
:!: You are so detached. I agree that we should leave these decisions to a higher power, and the Higher Power has made the decision. I'm just following it.
-
:!: You are so detached. I agree that we should leave these decisions to a higher power, and the Higher Power has made the decision. I'm just following it.
That's the thing though, I feel (and it's only my personal belief) that no one knows for sure what the higher power has decided. Therefore, we cannot make decisions on his/her behalf. Instead, we should just love one another, be tolerant of differences, and not be hasty to judge others. :)
-
1. Let me not profess to be perfect, but I try not to be judgemental of other people; rather I try to judge their actions so that I don't commit the same acts myself.
2. You are very entitled to your opinion and let me not force mine upon you.
3. I do believe that human beings have an unlimited capacity to devise any explanation for the things they do to justify them to themselves and to others who are so gulliable.
-
So what exactly are you on about? Do you think God already decided that all gay people should be condemned? Or do you believe God is a much greater force than that?
-
We should leave all the judgements and conclusions about what should and shouldn't be to the higher, divine power; and not try to interpret what's in a really old book and has been revised loads of times by different people.
The Bible is a complex work of which a thourough understanding requires specific expertise in multiple fields. As such, critics of The Bible do not deserve and should not expect the benefit of the doubt. They have to earn it.
What revisions? By who? And how do those revisions degrade the authenticity of the verses regarding homosexuality?
I don't necessarily expect any answers to those questions. I just wanted to make the point that those who make statements about The Bible (or anything sufficiently complex) without substantiation aren't stating anything more than a blind opinion. Which is fine, but carries no weight in a debate.
That's the thing though, I feel (and it's only my personal belief) that no one knows for sure what the higher power has decided. Therefore, we cannot make decisions on his/her behalf. Instead, we should just love one another, be tolerant of differences, and not be hasty to judge others.
Although, for different reasons, I agree with you about love, tolerance and being slow to judge people (homosexual or otherwise) :) If you don't know what the higher power has decided, then how do you know that he/she/it approves of love and tolerance and disapproves of hasty judgment? Are you not making decisions on his/her/it's behalf? By placing the decisions into the hands of an unknowable higher power you've removed any standard of morality all together.
-Kev
-
ok, i don't know where, and i know it's not in these exact words, but it does say in the bible something along the line of not judging others, lest you be judged as well - something of that sort.
even if you don't agree with it - why bother fighting love. to me, there's more important things to worry about than preventing two people who love each other from showing it.
-
The Bible is a complex work of which a thourough understanding requires specific expertise in multiple fields. As such, critics of The Bible do not deserve and should not expect the benefit of the doubt. They have to earn it.
I am not a theologian, and am not majoring in religious studies either. So I may not have the authority in your eyes to critique the information found in the Bible. But the opinions that I have expressed are those that have formed after years of being a practicing Roman Catholic, 8 years of Catholic school and all. I've examined my faith thoughtfully over time and have decided that love and compassion should be the basis of our existence in this world.
What revisions? By who? And how do those revisions degrade the authenticity of the verses regarding homosexuality?
What is in the Bible has been decided by Papal councils hundreds of years ago. They've decided what gospels are legit and what aren't. I can't give specifics because I haven't studied the Bible at length, but the books are out there, the History channel specials are out there. I'd love to study more on the subject. I'd have to talk to you about it at some later time.
I don't necessarily expect any answers to those questions. I just wanted to make the point that those who make statements about The Bible (or anything sufficiently complex) without substantiation aren't stating anything more than a blind opinion. Which is fine, but carries no weight in a debate.
Again, I'm no theologian, so I can't give you specifics. Maybe I can get back to you in two weeks with well researched facts.
Although, for different reasons, I agree with you about love, tolerance and being slow to judge people (homosexual or otherwise) :) If you don't know what the higher power has decided, then how do you know that he/she/it approves of love and tolerance and disapproves of hasty judgment? Are you not making decisions on his/her/it's behalf? By placing the decisions into the hands of an unknowable higher power you've removed any standard of morality all together.
I know that the higher power approves of love because it is what makes the world go round. I'm sure you would say that's blind faith, but there has to be something to that belief if there are world religions that share that belief in peace and love. There's something to be said about positivity and love. It is what keeps us healthy and happy. It's good energy. And we should practice this love, not because we fear something bad will happen to us if we don't, but because we care about others. Along with that, I feel that love is all inclusive. I don't think a positive and good creator would encourage the exclusion of others.
-
Again, I'm no theologian, so I can't give you specifics. Maybe I can get back to you in two weeks with well researched facts.
Nah, unless you really want to, there's no need. It's not a field I'm particularly well versed in either. Detailed debate has almost certainly been done better elsewhere. We could just look those up instead of arguing in here and derailing this thread more than I already have :)
-Kev
-
So what exactly are you on about? Do you think God already decided that all gay people should be condemned? Or do you believe God is a much greater force than that?
Quite the opposite! It's not God's will that anyone should be condemned. It's not the people who are evil; it's the things they do. The reason people get condemned is because they never ask forgiveness for the wrong they do, and I don't really know why that is. Nobody's expected to be perfect, everybody's expected to do wrong, but when they never admit it or try to stop, that only makes things worse.
NOTE: Before replying to this message, take notice that I did not condemn or imply condemnation on any person, thing, or action, so do not attack me for saying that I think any person, thing, or action is wrong.
-
Back in my homestate of Oklahoma that passed, so now it's pretty much "illegal" to be homosexual, I don't personally care if they're that way or not, they can go live their life, isn't any of my business, but if they hit on me then it becomes my business, and I'll hospitalize them, nothing personal, of course.
-
Again, I'm no theologian, so I can't give you specifics. Maybe I can get back to you in two weeks with well researched facts.
Nah, unless you really want to, there's no need. It's not a field I'm particularly well versed in either. Detailed debate has almost certainly been done better elsewhere. We could just look those up instead of arguing in here and derailing this thread more than I already have :)
-Kev
Okay, agreed. :)
-
No
-
Back in my homestate of Oklahoma that passed, so now it's pretty much "illegal" to be homosexual, I don't personally care if they're that way or not, they can go live their life, isn't any of my business, but if they hit on me then it becomes my business, and I'll hospitalize them, nothing personal, of course.
Was that supposed to be funny? Because it wasn't.
-
Back in my homestate of Oklahoma that passed, so now it's pretty much "illegal" to be homosexual, I don't personally care if they're that way or not, they can go live their life, isn't any of my business, but if they hit on me then it becomes my business, and I'll hospitalize them, nothing personal, of course.
Was that supposed to be funny? Because it wasn't.
Actually no, it wasn't supposed to be funny; I'll respect them as they respect me, and if they know I'm not homosexual yet still try to make a pass at me, then they're disrespecting me............and it's happened before, and I didn't hospitalize the guy, but still, if I respect you in your choice, you'll respect me in mine, or we'll have problems