NESSAholics.com

Other Topics => Polls => Topic started by: LimeTwister on November 29, 2003, 06:07:48 pm

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: LimeTwister on November 29, 2003, 06:07:48 pm

hmmm?

granted i didn't catch the whole story...but I was like what?

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: KULPDOGG on November 29, 2003, 06:21:32 pm

PUBLIC????
like people go there????
well, no.... kids could eat it and die and stuff

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: LimeTwister on November 29, 2003, 07:19:07 pm

i'm not sure how many people go and eat stuff at a land field...but I will have to try to catch the story again...it was on cnn.

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: B on November 29, 2003, 07:24:52 pm

I am not sure if this is what you saw or not, but it is somewhat recent....

Democrats: Bush broke promise on nuclear waste repository (http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/22/democrats.bush.ap/index.html)

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: LimeTwister on November 30, 2003, 01:35:15 pm

i don't think that is the same thing, but i do think it went with that story...

and now I can't find a story on it.

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: rosieposy87 on December 01, 2003, 12:19:34 pm

You want power? You deal with the mess by putting it in landfills. You can't have it both ways. Like sending those ships full of crap to us instead.

Title: should nuclear waste be put in public landfields?
Post by: Grakthis on December 02, 2003, 07:22:21 am

Quote from: "rosieposy87"

You want power? You deal with the mess by putting it in landfills. You can't have it both ways. Like sending those ships full of crap to us instead.

OR we can finally get our shiznit together and get our breader reactors working to recycle the nuclear waste.... (expensive, but it works)