106
General Vanessa Carlton Discussion / Re: Daily Californian review
« on: July 27, 2011, 07:07:00 pm »
I've noticed a bit of a trend though in the reviews.
There are those reviews where the critic has done his/her homework (where they refer to her influences... Watership Down and ABHOT) which are a bit more understanding (though they also have a few negative points as well). They even mention about the album being analog and all that.
It's clear that the above spazz has no idea that the "light, airy" piano is INTENDED and we wish the piano could've been a HELL LOT MORE LIGHTER and AIRIER so that he/she would've probably PASSED OUT listening to it and still not figure out that it WAS INTENDED.
Sigh.
Funny, how we take these things personally.
There are those reviews where the critic has done his/her homework (where they refer to her influences... Watership Down and ABHOT) which are a bit more understanding (though they also have a few negative points as well). They even mention about the album being analog and all that.
It's clear that the above spazz has no idea that the "light, airy" piano is INTENDED and we wish the piano could've been a HELL LOT MORE LIGHTER and AIRIER so that he/she would've probably PASSED OUT listening to it and still not figure out that it WAS INTENDED.
Sigh.
Funny, how we take these things personally.