Yup, there were plenty of WMD in Iraq. :roll:
To me, if we can't find them, they weren't such a prevalent danger to necesitate a pre-emptive strike.
What I love about the pro-war people before the war were all "Oh, we need to attack them because they could hit us" but now that we can't find WMDs are switching their ruitine instead of how it was needed just to "liberate" the people of Iraq. Load of croc.
lmao! we don't even have fricken
proof that they have nuclear weapons....of course we know that they could seeing as how we sold Sadaam Anthrax and other nuclear intelligence back in '82 (or was it '83, i can never remember)
And the 'weapons of mass distruction' that Sadaam does have can't hurt us....they can't even reach the capitol of Turkey....
All in all, the 'war' was a load of crap. I'm not saying that we shouldn't have tried to take out Sadaam, because he deserves to die. My close friend is from Iraq, and his family left when Sadaam began to gain power...the horrer stories from
then are enough to distrub anyone. However our excuse and the way we did it was appalling.....no wonder the other half of the world can't stand us. President Bush doesn't know if he's coming or going, much less whether or not a country poses a threat to us. This war has only dragged us deeper in debt.
We were supposed to be liberating these people, but now we're controlling what kind of government they 'choose' to set up. Like they have any choice anymore! We're forcing them to set up a democracy, which most of Iraq doesn't even want. My Global History teacher is now in Bhagdad setting up these "interem Governments' and he said how the people are extremely resistent...as they should be.
*whew* sorry....went on a little tangent there..... :oops:
