why aren't images showing up?

[Holly]

when i try to post a new image, they don't show up... see, like this:



am I doing something wrong?

[Si]

I see one of my sig things doesn't show up either...
but it used to have .img at the end
I don't see that now
hmm
 :?

[Scotty]

well if anything an image usually ends with



or



or

[Fairy]

when i try to post a new image, they don't show up... see, like this:



am I doing something wrong?

it might be cause there is something in the http:---------lalalblahlballha.com/slkjasdksdf that breaks the [img] code thingy!

[Si]

when i try to post a new image, they don't show up... see, like this:



am I doing something wrong?

it might be cause there is something in the http:---------lalalblahlballha.com/slkjasdksdf that breaks the [img] code thingy!

but there's an image in my sig, that has none of that stuff, and that's not showing up either...

[Trolan]

Due to some creative abuse of the img BBCode which was diccovered by the authors of the forum software, images are currently restricted to the following extensions: jpg, jpeg, gif, png.  If the img tag doesn't end with that, and has anything else after it, it'll just be printed verbatim.  Reading up on the whys of this change, I do have to agree with it.  We can add additional extensions if needed, but I do have to concur with the developers on this adjustment: it makes sense.

Tech explanation of the why of the change:

Code: [Select]

[img]http://forumname.com/forum/login.php?logout=true[/img]

That little snippet in someone's img tag would just spit out a broken image tag, and also log the viewer out of the forum.  Not exactly a desirable effect.  This is just one of the tamer possibilities available, I can think of much more interesting end-results.

[Si]

Due to some creative abuse of the img BBCode which was diccovered by the authors of the forum software, images are currently restricted to the following extensions: jpg, jpeg, gif, png.  If the img tag doesn't end with that, and has anything else after it, it'll just be printed verbatim.  Reading up on the whys of this change, I do have to agree with it.  We can add additional extensions if needed, but I do have to concur with the developers on this adjustment: it makes sense.

Tech explanation of the why of the change:

Code: [Select]

[img]http://forumname.com/forum/login.php?logout=true[/img]

That little snippet in someone's img tag would just spit out a broken image tag, and also log the viewer out of the forum.  Not exactly a desirable effect.  This is just one of the tamer possibilities available, I can think of much more interesting end-results.

Yah
I have no idea what you mean
But my image used to have .gif at the end, so it should be ok then, no?
*confused
 :?

edit: Nevermind, I fixed mine now.

[KULPDOGG]

images are currently restricted to the following extensions: jpg, jpeg, gif, png.

thats weird, cause my sig was always .bmp
and it worked all up till today cause i just updated my profile
 :cry:
grrrrrrrr
oH the ExcessiVe ProCess oF Changing it tO .JPg!!!!!! :oops:

 :x  i'll fix it.. hold on :evil:

[KULPDOGG]

no matter what i did photobucket wouldn;t change it to jpg

so, by mericle, i discovered i still had a boomspeed account 8O  :razz:

so..yeah, its on there for now.. :roll: