US political parties

[tylor2000]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

[rosieposy87]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

[tylor2000]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

[rosieposy87]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

[tylor2000]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

[rosieposy87]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

Just because 'british policy is wrong in general' in your opinion (and certainly not in mine) does NOT mean that i am wrong. What is 'wrong' in this situation anyway? You made an inductive leap- i.e an assumption which is clearly not true in this case.

[tylor2000]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

Just because 'british policy is wrong in general' in your opinion (and certainly not in mine) does NOT mean that i am wrong. What is 'wrong' in this situation anyway? You made an inductive leap- i.e an assumption which is clearly not true in this case.

Well at least you understand what I was saying.  But how can it be considered an opinion when it can be proven right or wrong?

Edit: replace 'right and wrong with 'true or false' above.

tylor

[rosieposy87]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

Just because 'british policy is wrong in general' in your opinion (and certainly not in mine) does NOT mean that i am wrong. What is 'wrong' in this situation anyway? You made an inductive leap- i.e an assumption which is clearly not true in this case.

Well at least you understand what I was saying.  But how can it be considered an opinion when it can be proven right or wrong?

Edit: replace 'right and wrong with 'true or false' above.

tylor

Well in that case, how can you say British policy is 'wrong', 'right', 'true' or 'false'?

[tylor2000]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

Just because 'british policy is wrong in general' in your opinion (and certainly not in mine) does NOT mean that i am wrong. What is 'wrong' in this situation anyway? You made an inductive leap- i.e an assumption which is clearly not true in this case.

Well at least you understand what I was saying.  But how can it be considered an opinion when it can be proven right or wrong?

Edit: replace 'right and wrong with 'true or false' above.

tylor

Well in that case, how can you say British policy is 'wrong', 'right', 'true' or 'false'?

Well in the case of inducing either you could give examples supporting your generalization, the overwhelming trend giving evidence to your assertion, emperically giving proof it is true or false.

tylor

[xxjenniferxx]

Don't worry Rosie, the official British international political position has been consistently wrong so many times (take the Iraq war for instance,) as soon as we found out the british supported the war it should of tipped us NOT to support the war....or other things international stuff.....

 

tylor

Errr not quite sure why on earth you posted this Tylor.

Just in jest.  Might have some truth to it, no?  The war was just a stupid example really...

tylor

Why does it bear any relevance to environmental issues? Just trying to insult me?

It is a hypothetical deduction I at first (and very quikly) induced impling british policy to be wrong in general, and consequently you.  Something british people might actaully agree with. I'm debating you.  I actaully have too much respect for you to insult you on a personal level.

tylor

Just because 'british policy is wrong in general' in your opinion (and certainly not in mine) does NOT mean that i am wrong. What is 'wrong' in this situation anyway? You made an inductive leap- i.e an assumption which is clearly not true in this case.

Well at least you understand what I was saying.  But how can it be considered an opinion when it can be proven right or wrong?

Edit: replace 'right and wrong with 'true or false' above.

tylor

Well in that case, how can you say British policy is 'wrong', 'right', 'true' or 'false'?

Well in the case of inducing either you could give examples supporting your generalization, the overwhelming trend giving evidence to your assertion, emperically giving proof it is true or false.

tylor

true or false..

[Grakthis]

Want to see jobs be sucked even faster out of this country?  Sign the treaty.

If it makes econmic sense for jobs to leave this country then the jobs SHOULD leave this country.  If you doubt this, then you know nothing about econmics and should exit this conversation, stage left.

There are ways to prune the job issue if we really wanted to.

[tylor2000]

Want to see jobs be sucked even faster out of this country?  Sign the treaty.

If it makes econmic sense for jobs to leave this country then the jobs SHOULD leave this country.  If you doubt this, then you know nothing about econmics and should exit this conversation, stage left.

There are ways to prune the job issue if we really wanted to.

It makes no sense as an economic policy with our interests in mind to allow them to be.  If you doubt this, then give me access to your bank accounts.  Edit: But I am aware of some of the benefits....I don't really think they are justified really.

 But you are right there are ways to prune the job issue but I don't see them in action.

tylor

[drummerboy512]

democrat...and i'm votin for kerry

[sayyouwould]

democrat...and i'm votin for kerry

Kerry is a babe.

[Laura]

eww Kerry reminds me of Bill Clinton, haha

But anywho, yeah since I'll actually be able to vote when it comes election time, I have finally made up my mind who I am voting for.. & *holds breath* Kerry...

Yup. I was all for Bush, & was really gonna vote for him & everything, but last night I caught the end of the 20 million questions thing for Kerry on MTV (I know MTV blah blah blah, hush!) & when he was talkin about the whole gay marriage thing, I was like "wow, I'm shocked he said that!" I thought he would be all totally against it, but I thought his answer was honest. I am straight of course, but I thought his answer to that was a good one. Totally surprised me.

You know, I probably wouldn't even be saying this but my Economics teacher makes us look at what both parties have to say whether your a democrat, republican etc. so yeah. I'm gonna catch it next time it's on then decide. And see what he has to say about all the other issues & stuff.

Just thought I'd share.