What bugs me is that our legal system was so incredibly quick to grab Martha, put her on trial, and convict her, when she really isn't a danger to society. However, I can think of three other high profile cases in which the defendants could and in the last case, definitely are a danger to society: Kobe Bryant, Michael Jackson, and Saddam Hussein. Michael Jackson, I believe, thoguh, settled out of court, and Kobe's has been dragging on for quite some time? Or has his trial only just begun? Okay, I suppose I'll admit that Saddam Hussein was being kept for the Iraqi's to try, but still...the legal system was not nearly as quick to try and convict the other two, who could have posed a threat to society. So why is it that Martha Stewart was the one who needed to be taken care of most quickly?
I'm not saying that she's innocent; I didn't follow her trial at all, so I don't know any of the evidence; I'm just saying the speed of the whole thing bugs me...