Author Topic: Article of V in the New York Times (Read 4556 times)

JazzyManda · « **on:** August 21, 2004, 09:13:20 am »

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/22/arts/music/22PLAY.html

ANESSA CARLTON This wildly popular (and, somehow, underrated) piano balladeer — best known for her breakthrough smash, "A Thousand Miles" — returns with a spooky, dazzling new song, "White Houses," accompanied by an even spookier music video. (Find both at www.vanessacarlton.com.) Five short piano notes and then the verse starts, as Ms. Carlton floats down from falsetto to mourn the end of a beautiful, scary summer. She sings of "strange new friends" and "pretty-eyed boys" and then, "My first time, hard to explain/ Rush of blood, oh, and a little bit of pain." The video, directed by Sophie Muller (who has also made great videos for Bjork and No Doubt), is just as ambivalent. Two Vanessa Carltons perform in the same room; one plays piano and sings while the other works on a ballet-inspired — and, occasionally, computer-enhanced — dance routine. The pianist (envious? contemptuous? confused? anxious?) gazes at the dancer, but the dancer never gazes back, although she does crawl on top of the piano to sing the last verse.

i gotta wear shades posted this on the O-board

Amanda

Manda · « **Reply #1 on:** August 21, 2004, 10:00:48 am »

thanks Amanda.

returns with a spooky, dazzling new song, "White Houses," accompanied by an even spookier music video

:razz:

JazzyManda · « **Reply #2 on:** August 21, 2004, 10:24:32 am »

Quote from: "Manda"

thanks Amanda.

returns with a spooky, dazzling new song, "White Houses," accompanied by an even spookier music video

:razz:

when watching the music video i've never thought "oh, this is spooky..."
lol

welcome

Amanda

Gina · « **Reply #3 on:** August 21, 2004, 10:29:43 am »

Awesome article, thanks for sharing!

Though.. I never found it spooky either... :wink:

amberbeads · « **Reply #4 on:** August 21, 2004, 04:49:55 pm »

so what exactly was "computer-enhanced"?
that's slightly disappointing.

nessaRox · « **Reply #5 on:** August 21, 2004, 07:20:22 pm »

nice!

:wink: :wink:

JazzyManda · « **Reply #6 on:** August 21, 2004, 08:17:52 pm »

Quote from: "amberbeads"

so what exactly was "computer-enhanced"?
that's slightly disappointing.

like the anti gravity stuff i.e. the dance moves where she somehow gets up off the ground without both feet flat (not enough weight on one side of her body) on the ground... etc

Amanda

amberbeads · « **Reply #7 on:** August 22, 2004, 06:54:52 am »

hmm, i never noticed that both feet weren't on there. i'll have to look again.

CheapandEvilgrl · « **Reply #8 on:** August 22, 2004, 10:35:45 am »

I'd still like to hear what vanessa has to say about computer enhancement being used because it really doesn't look that artificial to me. I've learned most of the dance including the leaps so if I can do them I would think an SAB trained dancer would certainly be able to as well. The hardest thing she does in the video are those yoga tree pose turns. If you're legs are strong enough for that chances are you can jump pretty high.

But eh, she could say it was enhanced and ill just look oblivious so I'll stop rambling now.

JazzyManda · « **Reply #9 on:** August 22, 2004, 11:16:33 am »

Quote from: "CheapandEvilgrl"

I'd still like to hear what vanessa has to say about computer enhancement being used because it really doesn't look that artificial to me. I've learned most of the dance including the leaps so if I can do them I would think an SAB trained dancer would certainly be able to as well. The hardest thing she does in the video are those yoga tree pose turns. If you're legs are strong enough for that chances are you can jump pretty high.

But eh, she could say it was enhanced and ill just look oblivious so I'll stop rambling now.

the enhanced part (i think) is where she gets off the floor after twisting around

Amanda

tylor2000 · « **Reply #10 on:** August 22, 2004, 11:40:06 am »

I think it is actaully possible based on center of gravity, though, it skips a crucial part in the video. That is a part where I bet she pushes off with here arms, backwards.

amberbeads · « **Reply #11 on:** August 22, 2004, 12:25:01 pm »

I agree with Tylor. When you watch it, the camera angle changes RIGHT when she'd be pushing with her arms. She could've done it, they just don't show it.

Xenophanes · « **Reply #12 on:** August 22, 2004, 05:30:36 pm »

Yep yep...I think I mentioned that in a chat somewhere or something. I think the computer enhancement involved with that could have been just putting it into slow motion.

amberbeads · « **Reply #13 on:** August 22, 2004, 05:54:23 pm »

Quote from: "Xenophanes"

Yep yep...I think I mentioned that in a chat somewhere or something. I think the computer enhancement involved with that could have been just putting it into slow motion.

good call.

CheapandEvilgrl · « **Reply #14 on:** August 26, 2004, 03:38:15 pm »

Quote from: "amberbeads"

Quote from: "Xenophanes"
Yep yep...I think I mentioned that in a chat somewhere or something. I think the computer enhancement involved with that could have been just putting it into slow motion.

good call.

ahh yea..ok, I think I know which move you mean. And it does seem like its in slow motion at times.

News:

Author Topic: Article of V in the New York Times (Read 4556 times)

Xenophanes