Author Topic: The Lord Of The Rings  (Read 20594 times)

CheapandEvilgrl

  • Just a day, just an ordinary day
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Littlefish81
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2003, 09:51:32 pm »
saw it today

REALLY good

but waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long.
They could definitely cut down some of the battle scenes since I spend most of my time covering my eyes during those.

Vultch

  • Moderators
  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4644
  • Trading Yesterday
    • AOL Instant Messenger - BVulture
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theageof.info
    • Email
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2003, 09:59:28 pm »
Quote from: "CheapandEvilgrl"
but waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long.
They could definitely cut down some of the battle scenes since I spend most of my time covering my eyes during those.

maybe its just me but for being 3 1/2 hours, it really didnt feel like it. Story kept moving. I was totally into it.

Ghisy

  • VCUBs
  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *
  • Posts: 3789
  • V-Unit!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Ghis+V
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2003, 03:51:05 am »
Quote from: "blackvulture"
Quote from: "CheapandEvilgrl"
but waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long.
They could definitely cut down some of the battle scenes since I spend most of my time covering my eyes during those.

maybe its just me but for being 3 1/2 hours, it really didnt feel like it. Story kept moving. I was totally into it.


Word.
Just like the 2nd one, I didn't even notice it was 3 hours and 20 minute-long.
I really can't wait for the dvd! haha  :D
Ghisy
The Original French NESSAholic

kev222

  • VCUBs
  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *
  • Posts: 3194
  • zero vector
    • AOL Instant Messenger - k3v222
    • View Profile
    • http://www.kev.nu/vc
    • Email
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2003, 09:33:01 am »
I agree. If I had my way it would be one 11 hour epic.

-Kev

JazzyManda

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
    • AOL Instant Messenger - JazzyTrumpet07
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2003, 09:38:51 am »
there were places in that movie where they should have just ended it right there and like did a fade out you know? but no, they just kept the story going, and going and going. they should have cut that last 20 min out because it was just a bunch of blaaaaaaaaah. otherwise, i thought the movie was amazing. awesome scenery and special effects.

Amanda

Layla

  • Just a day, just an ordinary day
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2003, 10:29:59 am »
I just sawed it. Too long for my liking but still good. Funniest part was Frodo... 'Gaaandalf?'  :lol: sooooo chessy

I feel like a shadow
Walking behind who you think I am
Just like my shadow

Ghisy

  • VCUBs
  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *
  • Posts: 3789
  • V-Unit!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Ghis+V
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2003, 11:52:38 am »
Quote from: "kev222"
I agree. If I had my way it would be one 11 hour epic.

-Kev


haha, I hear ya dude! ;)
Ghisy
The Original French NESSAholic

rosieposy87

  • VCUBs
  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *
  • Posts: 3394
  • Prat Twin #2
    • MSN Messenger - rosie_posy87@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - rosieposy87
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2003, 12:06:04 pm »
I am speechless. It was beyond amazing. I cried so many times! I agree the ending was a little tedious but it was only to stay true to the book- and i'd rather that than a swift ending.
"I'm all about the wordplay."

LimeTwister

  • Guest
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2003, 12:24:27 pm »
do i need to see the 2nd one before this one?

because i did see the first one, but not the 2nd one... *hmm*

Vultch

  • Moderators
  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4644
  • Trading Yesterday
    • AOL Instant Messenger - BVulture
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theageof.info
    • Email
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2003, 12:53:55 pm »
Quote from: "LimeTwister"
do i need to see the 2nd one before this one?
because i did see the first one, but not the 2nd one... *hmm*

yes they all feed off eachother.

and as for all the endings... after living with these characters for the past 3 years, they've earned the proper sendoff for each character the way they did. I loved it.

Alecs

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2268
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #25 on: December 21, 2003, 05:26:47 pm »
I was gonna watch it last night but we all decided to watch part 1 and 2 again b4 seeing the new just so we are all in check ya know? I can't wait, I know it's gonna kick arse!
"The crows seemed to be calling his name thought Caw..."

Layla

  • Just a day, just an ordinary day
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #26 on: December 22, 2003, 05:22:31 am »
Quote from: "LimeTwister"
do i need to see the 2nd one before this one?

yes yes yes  :D

I feel like a shadow
Walking behind who you think I am
Just like my shadow

Gina

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4419
    • View Profile
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #27 on: December 22, 2003, 08:12:01 am »
Quote from: "CheapandEvilgrl"
but waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long.
They could definitely cut down some of the battle scenes since I spend most of my time covering my eyes during those.


agreed. but maybe thats because i really didn't care to see it that much in the first place.  I saw the first two, they're not my type of movies, but never the less- they are good, if thats the kind of movie you enjoy.  It's pretty amazing the graphics n things they use... I can totally see why they win awards- but its still not my thing.   :D but hey i didn't fall asleep this time! 8)
Gina
.She'd do anything to sparkle in his eye.

Jophess

  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *****
  • Posts: 3641
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
    • Email
The Lord Of The Rings
« Reply #28 on: December 22, 2003, 08:21:03 am »
I hate LOTR, and all my friends do, so recently, they've all been too busy with RotK to pay attention to me!  :(
Joe

Wonkies

  • Ex-Mod
  • You aren't tryin'
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
    • AOL Instant Messenger - W0nkies
    • View Profile
    • http://www.neverbrokenmusic.com
SHOULD HAVE BEEN LONGER! :)
« Reply #29 on: December 22, 2003, 10:55:13 am »
(WARNING:  THIS POST CONTAINS SCENES THAT WERE NOT IN THE MOVIE, BUT WERE IN THE BOOK.  HOWEVER, IT MAY CONTAIN PLOT SPOILERS! So, if you haven't read the book and you're planning on seeing it and don't want to know anything, then don't read my post!)

The movie was incredible!  Best movie EVER!!!  However, for those who thought the movie was too short, it actually should have been longer and I wish it was.  If you haven't read the book here are a few things that were missing from it.:  At the end of ROTK there is a whole chapter in the book titled "The Scouring of the Shire" where the Hobbits go back and find the Shire a mess.  They then discover that Saruman and Wormtongue, after being banished from Isengard, had taken over the Shire and corrupted many of the hobbits there. With the help of "the heroes" the Hobbits rally up against Saruman and Wormtongue then Wormtongue ends up killing Saruman.  Wormtongue is then promptly killed by Hobbits.  From what I have heard, they didn't even film "The Scouring" so it won't even be in the extended DVD.  I'm bummed about that because I was looking forward to seeing that entire chapter on screen, but I thought the movie was absolutely awesome anyway!  There is also a whole bunch of stuff that goes on between Faramir and Eowyn which results in them falling in love and getting married, which would have been cool to put in, but not absolutely necessary.  If anyone noticed it, that's why you see them standing together, smiling at each other, in that ceremony at the end.  Like I said, I thought the movie was incredible, but as a fan of the book I do wish they would not have left a lot of this out.

Quote from: "kev222"
Quote from: "blackvulture"
I saw it tonight.... *speechless*

A beautiful ending to a GREAT epic!

Quick note however... In pt3 when the soldiers ride out from the city on the suicide run, they pass by some children, the human child in the foreground is the same totally cute hobbit kid in pt1 that sits there while Bilbo reads the story. The kid is all  8O and is the cutest thing!

I think that is Peter Jackson's little kid (according to a documentary I saw).

She's also in The Two Towers with all of the women and children in the caves at Helm's Deep.  I thought that was pretty screwy that you see the same kid in different roles in all three movies, but she is cute as a button! :razz:  lol!  I suppose that's why she's so noticeable.

http://www.neverbrokenmusic.com
"Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson