Just because I have a different opinion from you doesn't mean you have to attack my opinion. I'm not even going to defend my opinion to you because you're obviously too immature to handle differences in opinion.
LOL.
Who's immature? Did you even READ your own response?
"You hurt my feelings so I'm not talking to you anymore. WAAAAAAHHHHH MOMMY!!!!"
If you disagree with someones 'opinion' then you should, in fact, attack that opinion. That's like saying 'just because there are termites living in your woodwork doesn't mean you have to attack them'. Sure. I don't HAVE to. But if I don't they will provide a CONSTANT annoyance to me.
Maturity has NOTHING to do with this discussion. It's about you showing a severe lack of taste in declaring that underworld is a good movie.
Not that I am defending Blade 2. But atleast it qualifies under the "cheesy action flick" clause and is, therefore, watchable.
Underworld doesn't even fit THAT qualification because the action SUCKED.
Have you ever checked the numbers on Underworld at the box office? Even with a hottie like Kate Beckinsale in it, the movie TANKED. I mean, Battlefield Eart style. If THAT many people said it was THAT bad, how can you possibly defend your position?
If you had said "yeah, I know underworld sucks.... but for some reason I found it entertaining anyways" I would have shrugged and said "fine". But you are trying to argue that it is a decent movie. Which is just STUPID.
