« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11

Author Topic: STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE  (Read 55690 times)

Ghisy

  • VCUBs
  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *
  • Posts: 3789
  • V-Unit!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Ghis+V
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #120 on: June 06, 2005, 09:30:37 am »
Quote from: "kev222"
That doesn't count as nude. Rip off!

;-)

WERD!!!!11!! :P
The pic is awesome. HQ anyone, puuuuh-lease?
Logged
Ghisy
The Original French NESSAholic

BWilli

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4856
    • MSN Messenger - bdubprod@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #121 on: June 06, 2005, 09:59:38 am »
Quote from: "Ghisy"
The pic is awesome. HQ anyone, puuuuh-lease?


sorry about the quality of the scan....i made it smaller b/c  in the larger pic, she looked like she had scales and it was just weird  :lol:
Logged

Dora

  • Your true colors shown
  • *****
  • Posts: 657
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vanessa-carlton.org
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #122 on: June 06, 2005, 10:47:38 am »
Quote from: "BWilli"
Quote from: "Ghisy"
The pic is awesome. HQ anyone, puuuuh-lease?


sorry about the quality of the scan....i made it smaller b/c  in the larger pic, she looked like she had scales and it was just weird  :lol:


my scanner sucks.
Logged

BWilli

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4856
    • MSN Messenger - bdubprod@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #123 on: June 06, 2005, 10:51:40 am »
Quote from: "Dora"
Quote from: "BWilli"
Quote from: "Ghisy"
The pic is awesome. HQ anyone, puuuuh-lease?


sorry about the quality of the scan....i made it smaller b/c  in the larger pic, she looked like she had scales and it was just weird  :lol:


my scanner sucks.


mine is just weird...when I scan images, they turn out very strange looking.
Logged

VanessaPiana

  • Just a day, just an ordinary day
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
    • Email
come again?
« Reply #124 on: June 06, 2005, 01:21:49 pm »
atheohieo
Logged

amberbeads

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2296
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Idledaylight01
    • View Profile
    • http://shameless-selfpromo.blogspot.com
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #125 on: June 06, 2005, 02:27:30 pm »
Aaaaand we would know that how? :?
Logged
*natalie*



at least i can say
i was not afraid
i loved you all the way
i'd pick the fool any day.

NESSAussie

  • Fine as dandelions
  • *****
  • Posts: 1935
    • MSN Messenger - nessaussie@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • http://www.mybiopro.com/AU/?ID=harmonium
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #126 on: June 06, 2005, 06:50:52 pm »
Quote from: "BWilli"
Quote from: "Dora"
Quote from: "BWilli"
sorry about the quality of the scan....i made it smaller b/c  in the larger pic, she looked like she had scales and it was just weird  :lol:

my scanner sucks.

mine is just weird...when I scan images, they turn out very strange looking.

Your scan is better considering the low set lighting of what resembles a grove
of bamboo. You should have the option to remove moire patterns somewhere
in the software that came with your scanner; unless it sucks like Dora's :oops: :P
Logged

Dora

  • Your true colors shown
  • *****
  • Posts: 657
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vanessa-carlton.org
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #127 on: June 06, 2005, 08:03:56 pm »
Quote from: "NESSAussie"
Quote from: "BWilli"
Quote from: "Dora"
Quote from: "BWilli"
sorry about the quality of the scan....i made it smaller b/c  in the larger pic, she looked like she had scales and it was just weird  :lol:

my scanner sucks.

mine is just weird...when I scan images, they turn out very strange looking.

Your scan is better considering the low set lighting of what resembles a grove
of bamboo. You should have the option to remove moire patterns somewhere
in the software that came with your scanner; unless it sucks like Dora's :oops: :P



 :cry: at least I try right lol
Logged

BWilli

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4856
    • MSN Messenger - bdubprod@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #128 on: June 07, 2005, 03:27:46 am »
Quote from: "NESSAussie"
Your scan is better considering the low set lighting of what resembles a grove
of bamboo. You should have the option to remove moire patterns somewhere
in the software that came with your scanner; unless it sucks like Dora's :oops: :P



probably...i haven't read too much on how to use that specific scanner...the one I have at work is much better, the one at home seems more complicated and i'm just too lazy to take the time to figure out the software   :razz:
Logged

Steveau

  • VCUBs
  • Fine as dandelions
  • *
  • Posts: 1517
  • OLD man whistling
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Steveau98
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #129 on: June 07, 2005, 02:44:53 pm »
Quote from: "Ghisy"
Quote from: "kev222"
That doesn't count as nude. Rip off!

;-)

WERD!!!!11!! :P
The pic is awesome. HQ anyone, puuuuh-lease?


It's so Blue Lagoon!
Logged

Angelcorrine

  • Make me high on lullabies
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #130 on: June 07, 2005, 04:58:53 pm »
Omg, that was so scandelous that I'm not going to go see the most awesome concert ever with Vanessa and Stevie Nicks.

Pfffft.

</sarcasm>  

Seriously, its tasteful and artsy, and actually all the celebrity pictures in there were pretty nice.  Although I could have done without seeing Jason Mraz naked.  I thought he was totally cute before I saw that one... :p  

Vanessa has, however, shown me that I need to go on a massive diet.  So if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go run now.  And maybe eat some tofutti afterwards.  And no bread for dinner. :p
Logged

Gina

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4419
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #131 on: June 07, 2005, 06:16:54 pm »
She looks absolutely gorgeous... so tasteful.
Logged
Gina
.She'd do anything to sparkle in his eye.

zurielshimon

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2690
    • AOL Instant Messenger - weetbixkid36
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/193866568
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #132 on: June 07, 2005, 08:32:21 pm »
I actually saw it today at CVS.  I was in there to get things for someone else, and I saw 'Jane' on the rack, so I flipped it open and found her.  Anyone hoping for an HQ scan, bear this in mind:  HQ is a relative term!  The pic itself isn't even HQ; it's really dotty.  But she is beautiful. :D
Logged
Dustin

Scotty

  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *****
  • Posts: 3794
    • MSN Messenger - c_slaughter14@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - pianoguy1588
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - nessaholic88@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #133 on: June 08, 2005, 01:06:45 am »
Quote from: "zurielshimon"
I actually saw it today at CVS.  I was in there to get things for someone else, and I saw 'Jane' on the rack, so I flipped it open and found her.  Anyone hoping for an HQ scan, bear this in mind:  HQ is a relative term!  The pic itself isn't even HQ; it's really dotty.  But she is beautiful. :D


Hi-Res will be good too.
Logged

Unoriginal Dum-Dums

VaderDawsn

  • I'd Walk A Thousand Miles...
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
    • View Profile
STARS GET NAKED FOR JANE
« Reply #134 on: June 08, 2005, 03:33:39 pm »
When I heard that VC was going to be "nude" I was worried.
 But after seeing the picture, I really do think it was very tasteful and not really "nude".  
I hope this "Exposure" does encourage some JANE readers to want to learn more about VC and check out her music!
Logged
-Samantha

For me it's a glance
And a smile on your face
A touch of your hands
An honest embrace - VC, Home
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11
« previous next »