Author Topic: More sig limitations  (Read 22862 times)

sayyouwould

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2214
    • MSN Messenger - xsayyouwouldx@msn.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - sayyouwould
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« on: February 22, 2004, 07:45:09 am »
I have been doing some experimenting...not to irritate anyone of course...just for my own good. You can make your signature as big as you want adding loads of spaces in there but you can only have images to add up to 400x120. So I'm thinking....ok what is the point of that? I can just be annoying and put a huge space between all my letters and make my profile be wicked long...well, if you can make it as big as you want there why can't you have 2 images in your profile? I'm not saying make a new rule for the letter and space thing just a bigger sig would make some people so very happy.


ok don't yell at me...I take negitivity better in PM.

Thanks.
I rely on my illusions to keep me warm at night

Gina

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4419
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2004, 07:46:38 am »
I think if sigs were allowed to be much bigger, it'd get extremely annoying.  Posts would all take up way too much spaces, and you'd havta scroll a ton to read through all the posts... idk.  Maybe thats just my opinion and maybe I'm just lazy  :)
Gina
.She'd do anything to sparkle in his eye.

sayyouwould

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2214
    • MSN Messenger - xsayyouwouldx@msn.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - sayyouwould
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2004, 07:49:40 am »
but right now someone can have a bunch of spaces in their profile and you could still have to scroll...


and the load thing well...how about if you can only have one animated sig? Animated sigs take longer than regular sigs to load soooooooo there you go.
I rely on my illusions to keep me warm at night

Vultch

  • Moderators
  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4644
  • Trading Yesterday
    • AOL Instant Messenger - BVulture
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theageof.info
    • Email
Re: More sig limitations
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2004, 07:49:49 am »
Quote from: "sayyouwould"
ok don't yell at me...I take negitivity better in PM.

you take it better in a PM but you have no problem posting it in open public.
For the moment we only limit images in hopes people will be civil enough not to abuse the freedoms of text. If those freedoms are abused, limits could be placed on those as well.
Be careful.

sayyouwould

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2214
    • MSN Messenger - xsayyouwouldx@msn.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - sayyouwould
    • View Profile
Re: More sig limitations
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2004, 07:51:14 am »
Quote from: "blackvulture"
Quote from: "sayyouwould"
ok don't yell at me...I take negitivity better in PM.

you take it better in a PM but you have no problem posting it in open public.
For the moment we only limit images in hopes people will be civil enough not to abuse the freedoms of text. If those freedoms are abused, limits could be placed on those as well.
Be careful.



Well sir I already talked to a mod in PM about. But the mod stated that there is a whole board that I could use to bring it up to the other mods.
I rely on my illusions to keep me warm at night

Tia

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4783
    • MSN Messenger - littlemisscheekylives@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • http://www.graphic-interlude.com
    • Email
More sig limitations
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2004, 07:51:51 am »
:roflmao: @ bee vee!!

Couldn't they be a little bigger?
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.

Katia's Lover

  • I'd Walk A Thousand Miles...
  • *****
  • Posts: 1325
    • AOL Instant Messenger - GSUCarltonFan
    • View Profile
    • http://www.southern-connection.com
    • Email
More sig limitations
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2004, 08:21:36 am »
I'll be negative whenever I want.  In fact, I'm not being negative.  I'm just answering the question.

Sure, there's no rule keeping someone from putting spaces in their siggy to make it bigger.  What there is is COMMON SENSE.  I accidentally made my sig too big one time on here without even having a picture at all.  The mods jumped all over it--I got like four PMs in a matter of two hours.  

Maybe there's not a "written" law about texts in your sig, but if it gets too long for any reason the mods will use their common sense and tell you to fix it.

The pictures in the signatures are big enough.
katiakaysha: you win
katiakaysha: you're right

I'm on a mission to piss the world off.  Is it your turn yet?!

http://losersareentertaining.blogspot.com/

loveplasticlove

  • Moderators
  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2576
  • more rides than great adventure
    • AOL Instant Messenger - loveplasticlove
    • View Profile
Re: More sig limitations
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2004, 11:09:53 am »
Quote from: "sayyouwould"
Quote from: "blackvulture"
Quote from: "sayyouwould"
ok don't yell at me...I take negitivity better in PM.

you take it better in a PM but you have no problem posting it in open public.
For the moment we only limit images in hopes people will be civil enough not to abuse the freedoms of text. If those freedoms are abused, limits could be placed on those as well.
Be careful.



Well sir I already talked to a mod in PM about. But the mod stated that there is a whole board that I could use to bring it up to the other mods.


yes and I already sent the message to all the mods about your concern.
"I'm not a slave to a god that doesn't exist."  -Marilyn Manson
SuperScientific: I have a eggroll to shove in your rice patty lol

sayyouwould

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2214
    • MSN Messenger - xsayyouwouldx@msn.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - sayyouwould
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2004, 11:38:52 am »
Thank you.  :D
I rely on my illusions to keep me warm at night

loveplasticlove

  • Moderators
  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2576
  • more rides than great adventure
    • AOL Instant Messenger - loveplasticlove
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2004, 11:42:10 am »
sure thing...
"I'm not a slave to a god that doesn't exist."  -Marilyn Manson
SuperScientific: I have a eggroll to shove in your rice patty lol

Scotty

  • Keepin' secrets at midnight
  • *****
  • Posts: 3794
    • MSN Messenger - c_slaughter14@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - pianoguy1588
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - nessaholic88@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2004, 12:03:30 pm »
I personally thing that sig space could be increased lengh ways since it doesnt take any more time to scroll down.

But also I think the maximum sig height could be incread by few pixels

Unoriginal Dum-Dums

Tia

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4783
    • MSN Messenger - littlemisscheekylives@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • http://www.graphic-interlude.com
    • Email
More sig limitations
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2004, 12:06:42 pm »
Quote from: "Scotty"
I personally thing that sig space could be increased lengh ways since it doesnt take any more time to scroll down.

But also I think the maximum sig height could be incread by few pixels


I agree with Scott!


Damn...I just lost all my dignity... :roll:

 :wink:
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.

Dancernl

  • Fine as dandelions
  • *****
  • Posts: 1828
    • AOL Instant Messenger - balletstar86
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/dancernl/Menu9.html
    • Email
More sig limitations
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2004, 01:22:40 pm »
Quote from: "Scotty"
I personally thing that sig space could be increased lengh ways since it doesnt take any more time to scroll down.

But also I think the maximum sig height could be incread by few pixels

mmmm, I already think it's annoying when a pic on a regular post is so wide that I have to scroll lengthwise to read all the other posts on the page.  I think sigs are fine the way they are.
It is a crime to kill a neighbor, and an act of heroism to kill an enemy.  But who is an enemy and who is a neighbor is purely a matter of social definition.  - E.R. Leach

Tia

  • Speeding into the horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 4783
    • MSN Messenger - littlemisscheekylives@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • http://www.graphic-interlude.com
    • Email
More sig limitations
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2004, 01:27:06 pm »
I think avs should be 100 x 100! :D
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.

sayyouwould

  • You never thought it'd hurt so bad
  • *****
  • Posts: 2214
    • MSN Messenger - xsayyouwouldx@msn.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - sayyouwould
    • View Profile
More sig limitations
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2004, 01:28:52 pm »
Quote from: "Dancernl"
Quote from: "Scotty"
I personally thing that sig space could be increased lengh ways since it doesnt take any more time to scroll down.

But also I think the maximum sig height could be incread by few pixels

mmmm, I already think it's annoying when a pic on a regular post is so wide that I have to scroll lengthwise to read all the other posts on the page.  I think sigs are fine the way they are.



If the width was changed to say 500 it would still be smaller than a quote...so the sig wouldn't have to make you scroll.
I rely on my illusions to keep me warm at night